First: Incident Background
In a tragic security development, a horrifying incident occurred in the village of “Al-Najila” in Matrouh Governorate, resulting in the death of three police officers during the pursuit of individuals sentenced for various crimes. In the aftermath of this incident, the security forces took several actions, including:
1. Detention of 23 women: Relatives of the wanted individuals were detained in an operation, using the women as leverage to pressure the families of the suspects.
2. Handing over two young men: Two young men from the village were handed over based on an informal agreement between the security forces and tribal elders in exchange for the release of the detained women.
3. Execution of the young men: Despite voluntarily handing themselves over, the young men were later executed, while the Ministry of Interior issued an official statement claiming that they were killed in a “firefight” and labeled them as “highly dangerous criminal elements.”
⸻
Second: Legal and Human Rights Analysis of the Events
1. Mass Detention of Women
• The detention of women from the families of the suspects constitutes a clear violation of basic rights and personal freedoms as outlined in Article (54) of the Egyptian Constitution, which prohibits detention except by judicial order.
• This action is a breach of human rights, as collective punishment is used to exert pressure on the families.
2. Execution After Surrendering the Two Young Men
• The execution of the two young men after they voluntarily surrendered represents a serious violation of their right to a fair trial and amounts to an “extrajudicial killing,” which contradicts international human rights standards under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Article 6).
3. Breach of Informal Agreements with Local Leadership
• The agreement between security forces and tribal elders regarding the release of the women in exchange for the surrender of the young men reflects a deterioration in the respect for informal agreements, which have long been part of conflict resolution mechanisms in tribal societies.
• The violation of this agreement undermines trust between security forces and local leaders, posing a threat to social peace in those regions.
4. Non-transparent Media Handling
• The insistence of the security forces on providing an official narrative accusing the young men without presenting any substantial evidence to support these claims reflects a policy of concealing facts in the media to serve security goals.
• Ignoring the testimonies of witnesses, lawyers, and community members diminishes the credibility of security institutions and further erodes trust in the system.
5. Ongoing Human Rights Violations
• What occurred is indicative of a vengeful policy, not one of justice, where power is used to suppress citizens rather than ensure fairness.
• Such policies foster a culture of fear and mistrust, opening the door to more violations.
⸻
Third: Expected Societal and Security Impacts
1. Loss of Trust in State Institutions
• Continued and repeated violations lead to the widespread erosion of trust between citizens and state institutions, particularly in border regions like Matrouh and Sinai, intensifying feelings of alienation between the community and the state.
2. Weakening Peaceful Solutions
• The execution of individuals after they voluntarily surrender sends a negative message regarding the treatment of wanted persons and encourages the use of violence rather than peaceful resolutions in the future.
3. Impact on Local Leadership
• Violating agreements with local leaders weakens their role in their communities and reduces their ability to mitigate tensions within tribal societies.
4. Rise in Tribal and Separatist Sentiments
• Continued escalation of such incidents leads to the growth of separatist tendencies, as intensive security measures against tribal communities create tensions that may lead to increased violence and chaos.
⸻
Fourth: Observations by the Andalus Institute for Tolerance & Anti-violence Studies (AITAS)
1. The Necessity of Safe Voluntary Surrender Policies
• It is crucial to develop legal and safe mechanisms to guarantee the voluntary surrender of suspects, ensuring that it occurs in a lawful manner with protections for their legal rights.
• These mechanisms should be a mean to reduce violence and extrajudicial killings and provide peaceful alternatives.
2. The Absence of Media Context Increases the Crisis
• The media must take its professional responsibilities seriously by ensuring a balanced and complete presentation of facts before endorsing any official narrative, thus helping to build bridges of trust between the community and the state.
3. Revenge Practices Rather Than Justice
• The vengeful policy that emerged in this incident contradicts the concept of justice and hinders any efforts to build a state that respects the law and ensures the protection of rights.
4. Undermining Community Leadership Increases the Risk
• It is essential to respect the role of local leaders in resolving disputes, which requires maintaining the credibility of community agreements and preventing violations by any party.
⸻
Fifth: Recommendations by the Andalus Institute for Tolerance & Anti-violence Studies (AITAS)
1. Conduct an Independent Judicial Investigation
• The Public Prosecution must conduct an independent and transparent investigation into the incident, ensuring full accountability for those responsible for the violations.
2. Hold Accountable Those Responsible for Detention and Execution
• Every person who issued or executed the orders for detention or execution must be held accountable and brought to justice to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
3. Invest in Voluntary Surrender Mechanisms
• Recommendation to develop policies that encourage the voluntary surrender of suspects through legal guarantees to protect them from violence or execution.
4. Strengthen the Role of Local Leadership
• It is necessary to support local leadership and involve them in the process of building social peace by respecting informal agreements and promoting community reconciliation.
5. Ensure Media Transparency
• Media outlets must commit to objectively covering events and refrain from promoting official narratives without thorough investigation and verification of facts.
6. Reevaluate Security Policies in Border Areas
• Security policies in border and desert areas must be reassessed through a developmental approach that respects human rights and fosters cooperation between the state and the community.
⸻
Conclusion
The events in “Al-Najila” represent more than just an isolated security incident; they signal growing tensions between the state and society in border regions. The situation requires comprehensive reform, starting with the respect of citizens’ rights, the activation of laws, and the provision of real and transparent justice.
Any further escalation in such areas could lead to more violence and social disintegration.
To view in PDF format 👇👇
https://tinyurl.com/27u29bgk